Abstract
This chapter discusses the use of one’s own memory as a source in historical research. As a historian who has employed interviews, memoirs, travelogues, and diaries in my research, I now put my own memory to a test and examine how using my own memories differs from studying the memories of others. The chapter explores my memories of Mikhail Gorbachev’s visit to Finland in 1989 and compares them with other sources, such as interviews with classmates, contemporary print media, photographs, and film material of the event. In a dual role of researcher and the researched, I demonstrate how lived experiences are supported by narrative elements and, in the end, how powerful memory can be.
Reference23 articles.
1. Abrams, L. (2010). Oral History Theory. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203849033
2. Analytic Autoethnography;Anderson, Leon;Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,2006
3. The GDR and the Memory Debate;Simine, Silke Arnold-de; Radstone, Susannah,2013
4. Neutrality as Identity? Finland's Quest for Security in the Cold War;Aunesluoma, Juhana; Rainio-Niemi, Johanna;Journal of Cold War Studies,2016
5. Eiranen, R. (2015). ‘The Narrative Self: Letters and Experience in Historical Research’. Private and Public Voices: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Letters and Letter Writing, ed. by Karin Koehler and Kathryn McDonal-Miranda. Interdisciplinary Press