Abstract
Tinbergen (1963) proposed that a complete understanding of any behavior requires knowledge of its function, evolutionary history, developmental history, and mechanism of operation. This chapter is largely concerned with gaining some insight into the nature of the biological mechanisms generating variation in human fertility and, consequently, demographic diversity within and across populations. My inquiry is informed by life history theory, an analytical framework within evolutionary theory for studying maturation, reproduction, and aging and the associated behavioral and physiological mechanisms underlying the allocation of resources to these processes. Different allocation patterns are referred to as life history strategies (LHSs) and are subject to natural selection. Biological mechanisms can be usefully conceptualized as a set of suitably timed strategic responses to signals. I discuss this and other ideas about the mechanisms that underlie the implementation of LHSs, and introduce the concepts of “ecomarkers” and “the physiological fallacy.”
Drawing on empirical studies and theoretical models, I examine some intriguing features of human reproductive physiology that are directly relevant to demographic research in both low- and high-fertility populations. Several points, some contrary to common assumptions, emerge from this inquiry. For example: (1) The marked within- and between-population variation in many features of female reproductive functioning challenges the widespread assumption that there is a universal “normal” human biology. (2) The most likely outcome of a human conception is early loss. This unseen natural selection in the production of offspring may hamper investigations of hypothesized associations of post-natal reproductive success with resources or with offspring quality, even in low fertility populations. (3) Competition between incompatible but essential functions shape the timing and operation of various mechanisms. Some biological, psychological and behavioral functions cannot readily co-occur. Of necessity, successful LHSs must juggle such incompatibilities regardless of the abundance of energy and other resources, therefore some reproductive mechanisms may not depend upon (or be responsive to) energy availability. (4) Biomedically, the absence of ovulation is typically considered a pathology (and in some cases it may be). But from a life history perspective, each option of ovulating/not ovulating is a fork in the reproductive road at which there is a strategic decision to continue engaging in the possibility of reproduction or to forego the current opportunity. Not ovulating in a given cycle can be the best strategy for optimizing lifetime reproductive success.
Reference167 articles.
1. The roles of the immune system in Women's reproduction: Evolutionary constraints and life history trade‐offs;Abrams, Elizabeth T.; Miller, Elizabeth M.;American Journal of Physical Anthropology,2011
2. Is Female Health Cyclical? Evolutionary Perspectives on Menstruation;Alvergne, Alexandra; Högqvist Tabor, Vedrana;Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2018
3. Hormonal Profiles of Natural Conception Cycles Ending in Early, Unrecognized Pregnancy Loss;BAIRD, DONNA DAY; WEINBERG, CLARICE R.; WILCOX, ALLEN J.; McCONNAUGHEY, D. ROBERT; MUSEY, PAUL I.; COLLINS, DELWOOD C.;The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism,1991
4. Fertility in Advanced Societies: A Review of Research: La fécondité dans les sociétés avancées: un examen des recherches;Balbo, Nicoletta; Billari, Francesco C.; Mills, Melinda;European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie,2012
5. The fetal and infant origins of adult disease.;Barker, D J;BMJ,1990