6. The Limits of Limitarianism

Author:

Huseby Robert1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Oslo

Abstract

This chapter starts by examining Robeyns’ instrumental limitarianism and argues that this view is not limitarian as such, since the intrinsic values to be promoted are better served by other instrumental principles. Next, it is argued that it is difficult to envision a compelling version of intrinsic limitarianism. The reason is first that the possible versions of intrinsic limitarianism suggested (but not endorsed) by Robeyns really rest on other values, pushing limitarianism back into the instrumental realm. Second, a version of limitarianism based directly on the (supposed) badness of having too much, is unconvincing. Subsequently, instrumental views (other than Robeyns’) are revisited, but also found wanting. Lastly, the attempt to defend a more limited limitarianism, a ‘limitarian presumption,’ is assessed and rejected.

Funder

European Research Council

Publisher

Open Book Publishers

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3