Heuristics and Eidetic in the Phenomenology of Culture

Author:

Yudkin Ihor1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Cultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv

Abstract

Eidetic abstractions based upon individuation together with heuristic programs for the examination of conjectures are the forms of intentional reflection developed within the intuitive thought. The initial point of such development is parcellation of cultural texts that is to be marked where the introduced relation “the whole – the parts” passes further to the relation “the inner – the outer” and “text – epoch” with the principle of subjective activity and the inner textual transformation in reflection that gain importance. It is textual spatial and temporal structure where eidetic and heuristic elements come into interaction most effectively; in particular, the construction of depth in a pictorial plane serves as the model for the cognition of historical reality that cannot be observed immediately. The model of labyrinth in which frames of the heuristic searches are displayed determines their procedures as the sequence of alternative choices where the continuous correction of hypotheses takes place. The premises for the development of heuristic programs are those of ambiguity and indefiniteness of eidetic images together with the self-denial of the automatism of rhetoric conventions. It is due to heuristics that the prototypes for textual eidetic images are to be found. Prototypes function as the eidetic abstractions of personal characters addressed to scenic interpretation. Textual cyclic structure builds up the necessary condition for the disclosure and mediation of distance between the text and history, from closed episodes to the epoch.

Publisher

Institute for Cultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine

Reference39 articles.

1. Aihenvald, Yu. A. (1977). Ostujev [Ostuzhev]. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (Jizn v iskusstve). 264 p. (In Russian)

2. Altshuller, G. S. (1973). Algoritm izobreteniya [The Algorithm of Invention]. Izd. 2-e, ispr. i dopl. Moscow: Moskovskii rabochii. 296 p. (In Russian)

3. Argyle, M. (1988). Bodily communication. 2nd ed. New York: Methuen. 364 p.

4. Arnheim, R. (1973). Vizualnoe myshlenie [Visual Thought]. Zritelnye obrazy. Fenomenologiya i eksperiment. Sbornik perevodov. Part 1. Dushanbe: Tadjikskii gos. universitet. P. 8–98. (In Russian)

5. Arnheim, R. (1976). Iskusstvo i vizualnoe vospriyatie [The Art and Visual Perception]. Moscow: Progress. 392 p. (In Russian)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3