Community Pharmacy–Based Pharmaceutical Care for Asthma Patients

Author:

Mangiapane Sandra1,Schulz Martin2,Mühlig Stephan3,Ihle Peter4,Schubert Ingrid5,Waldmann Hans-Christian6

Affiliation:

1. Sandra Mangiapane BSPharm, at time of writing, Research Associate, Center for Drug Information and Pharmacy Practice, ABDA—Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany

2. Martin Schulz PhD, Head, Center for Drug Information and Pharmacy Practice, ABDA; Adjunct Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt at Main, Germany

3. Stephan Mühlig PhD, Professor, Institute of Clinical Psychology, Technical University of Chemnitz, Germany

4. Peter Ihle MD, Senior Research Associate, Primary Health Care Research Group, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

5. Ingrid Schubert PhD, Head, Primary Health Care Research Group, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Cologne

6. Hans-Christian Waldmann PhD, Biostatistician and Head, MSB Statistical Consulting, Bremen, Germany

Abstract

BACKGROUND Despite significant progress in asthma drug therapy in recent years, there has been no major change in asthma morbidity and mortality. It is still important to determine whether pharmaceutical care (PC) influences health outcomes. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of PC with regard to clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes in adults with asthma. METHODS An intervention study was conducted over 12 months. At baseline, 39 community/retail pharmacies, 84 primary care physicians (general practitioners, internal specialists, chest physicians), and 183 patients (aged 18–65 y) diagnosed with asthma were included. To evaluate economic outcomes, 2 German statutory health insurance funds provided 2 years of claims data for their insured patients (n = 55). A 1:10 matching was carried out to compare the data of this intervention subgroup with those of a control group (n = 550). RESULTS Significant improvements were found for all humanistic outcomes (eg, asthma-specific quality of life, self-efficacy, knowledge, medication adherence). In addition, asthma severity, self-reported symptoms, peak expiratory flow, and patients’ inhalation technique improved. Increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and vital capacity were not significant over time. Evaluation of the insurance claims data revealed a shift toward better adherence to evidence-based therapy. CONCLUSIONS The study shows that PC for people with asthma has a positive impact on humanistic and, to some extent, on clinical outcomes. To determine potential economic benefits, future research should focus on patients with more severe asthma.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Reference36 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3