Cost-Effectiveness of Fluvastatin following Successful First Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the LIPS (Lescol Intervention Prevention Study), fluvastatin 80 mg/day reduced the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) by 22% versus placebo (p = 0.01) following successful first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with stable or unstable angina or silent ischemia. The cost-effectiveness of such therapy is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of fluvastatin following successful first PCI from a US healthcare system perspective. METHODS: We used a Markov model to estimate expected outcomes and costs of 2 alternative treatment strategies following successful first PCI in patients with stable or unstable angina or silent ischemia: (1) diet/lifestyle counseling plus immediate fluvastatin 80 mg/day; and (2) diet/lifestyle counseling only, with initiation of fluvastatin 80 mg/day following occurrence of future nonfatal MACE. The model was estimated with data from LIPS and other published sources. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the ratio of the difference in expected medical-care costs to the expected difference in life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) alternatively. RESULTS: Treatment with fluvastatin following successful first PCI was found to increase life expectancy by 0.78 years (QALYs 0.68). Cost-effectiveness of fluvastatin following successful first PCI is $13 505 per LY ($15 454 per QALY) saved. Ratios are lower for patients with diabetes ($9396 per LY; $10 718 per QALY) and those with multivessel disease ($9662 per LY; $11 076 per QALY). Findings were robust with respect to changes in key model parameters and assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: Fluvastatin therapy following PCI is cost-effective compared with other generally accepted medical interventions.