Prevention of Suboptimal β-Blocker Treatment in Patients with Myocardial Infarction

Author:

White C Michael1

Affiliation:

1. C Michael White PharmD, Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; Co-Director of Arrhythmia Research, Drug Information Center, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT 06102, FAX 860/545-2415

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the published data and clinical guidelines on the use of β-blockers in myocardial infarctions (MIs) and contrast that with actual clinical practice. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (January 1970–June 1999) was performed to identify all relevant articles. References from these articles were also evaluated for review if deemed important. DATA SYNTHESIS: Intravenous and oral β-blockers have been proven to improve outcomes in patients with MIs in numerous clinical trials. In current clinical practice, only 15% of MI patients receive intravenous β-blockers and long-term β-blocker therapy is used in <40% of patients without contraindications. However, they could be safely administered to 40% and 70% of these patients, respectively. Furthermore, most of these patients are receiving doses far below those found beneficial in clinical trials. Many of the real and perceived contraindications to β-blockers are reviewed to allow the practitioner to identify patients who are incorrectly excluded from β-blocker therapy. Also discussed are special clinical situations in which the benefits observed during clinical trials may not apply. CONCLUSIONS: β-blockers are valuable drugs in the treatment of peri-and post-MI. In clinical practice, most patients are not treated or are inadequately treated with β-blockers. Pharmacists should ensure that such patients actually have an absolute contraindication or unusual situation where therapy is not firmly indicated. Patients without absolute contraindications warrant titration to specific target doses or a target heart rate of 55–60 beats/min.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3