Comparison of Two Point-of-Care Lipid Analyzers for Use in Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessments

Author:

Dale Rita A1,Jensen Lisa H2,Krantz Mori J2

Affiliation:

1. Colorado Prevention Center, Denver, CO

2. Colorado Prevention Center

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care (POC) lipid testing is increasingly used in community-and office-based practice. Two analyzers commonly used in the US are CardioChek PA and Cholostech LDX. Both directly measure total cholesterol (TC) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), mandatory values in calculating a Framingham Risk Score (FRS). The FRS in turn informs the clinician of the need for lipid-modifying therapy and the degree of therapeutic intensity. Objective: To compare the performance of CardioChek PA and Cholestech LDX. Methods: Staff members from the Colorado Prevention Center were included in the study, with all having fasted for 12 hours beforo the testing. No medical history was obtained. A venous blood sample was collected for lipid measurements conducted in a laboratory, and 2 finger sticks were obtained at that time and analyzed immediately on-site using the POC analyzers. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were determined for each analyzer versus the laboratory analysis, with values greater than 0.75 defined as Indicators of excellent reproducibility. We then assessed how interanalyzer differences in TC or HDL-C impacted the FRS lipid categorization. Results: Thirty-four adults (aged 24-56 y) participated in the study. The ICC between Cholestech LDX and the laboratory standard exceeded 075 for all 4 lipid categories (TC, p = 0.96; HDL-C, p = 0.88; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, ρ = 0.87; triglycerides, ρ = 0.99). By contrast, the only ICC exceeding 0.75 using CardioChek PA was for triglycerides (ρ = 0.84). When applied in calculating the FRS, the Cholestech LDX analyzer misclassified fewer individuals for TC versus the CardioChek PA analyzer (5 vs 21). Overall, Cholestech LDX provided TC and HDL-C values in the correct FRS category more frequently versus CardioChek PA (TC, p < 0.001; HDL-C, p > 0.001). Limitations of the study include use of only 2 POC products and small sample size with no known risk factors. This project does not prove superior accuracy of either device, but reflects a real-world comparison of the analyzers conducted at a single center. Conclusions: The Cholestech LDX analyzer demonstrated better reproducibility than the CardioChek PA analyzer when compared with laboratory gold standard analysis and allowed more accurate categorization for FRS. Since results obtained from these analyzers have the potential to impact treatment decisions, larger, prospective, comparative studies seem warranted.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3