Inhibitory Metabolic Drug Interactions with Newer Psychotropic Drugs: Inclusion in Package Inserts and Influences of Concurrence in Drug Interaction Screening Software

Author:

Boyce Richard D1,Collins Carol2,Clayton Marc3,Kloke John4,Horn John R5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

2. Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle

3. Student in Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh

4. Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, The University of Wisconsin-Madison

5. Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington

Abstract

Background: Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations mandate that package inserts (Pls) include observed or predicted clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs), as well as the results of pharmacokinetic studies that establish the absence of effect. Objective: To quantify how frequently observed metabolic inhibition DDIs affecting US-marketed psychotropics are present in FDA-approved Pls and what influence the source of DDI information has on agreement between 3 DDI screening programs. Methods: The scientific literature and Pls were reviewed to determine all drug pairs for which there was rigorous evidence of a metabolic inhibition interaction or noninteraction. The DDIs were tabulated noting the source of evidence and the strength of agreement over chance. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the influence of source of DDI information on agreement among 3 DDI screening tools. Logistic regression was used to assess the influence of drug class, indication, generic status, regulatory approval date, and magnitude of effect on agreement between the literature and PI as well as agreement among the DDI screening tools. Results: Thirty percent (13/44) of the metabolic inhibition DDIs affecting newer psychotropics were not mentioned in Pls. Drug class, indication, regulatory approval date, generic status, or magnitude of effect did not appear to be associated with more complete DDI information in Pls. DDIs found exclusively in Pls were 3.25 times more likely to be agreed upon by all 3 DDI screening tools than were those found exclusively in the literature. Generic status was inversely associated with agreement among the DDI screening tools (odds ratio 0.11; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.89). Conclusions: The presence in Pls of DDI information for newer psychotropics appears to have a strong influence on agreement among DDI screening tools. Users of DDI screening software should consult more than 1 source when considering interactions involving generic psychotropics.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3