A practical value of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on prevalence of EEG abnormalities in COVID-19

Author:

Nikishkova Iryna,Kutikov Damir

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemics, the amount and volume of electroencephalographic (EEG) examinations have been limited for safety reasons. This has complicated not only an identification of specific EEG correlates of the disease but also an assessment of non-specific EEG changes in pa- tients with COVID-19, raising the question of detection of factors and the degree of their impact on prevalence of EEG abnormalities in COVID-19. In the PubMed database, three meta-analyses and three systematic reviews were selected on keywords “COVID-19”, “EEG”, “systematic review”, and “meta-analysis” in order to compare values of the prevalence of EEG abnormalities in patients with COVID-19. The systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which had been performed since 2020 and assessed the prevalence of EEG abnormalities in patients with COVID-19, had differences in their final results despite of an application of the same mathematical methods, criteria for classification of phenomena, usage of one limited base of sources with EEG results (the percentage of overlapped outcome data in the selected reviews and meta-analyses ranged from 22 % to 100 %). Differences between works, which were included in this article, on qualitative and quantitative values of degree of brain functional activity changes in a part of patients with COVID-19 have a sufficiently random nature due to not only volumes of the samples, but also a number of other subjective and objec- tive factors. The results of the presented systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest, that not all of the obtained EEG data might be extrapolated on a cohort of patients with COVID-19, as the vast majority of patients with COVID (from 85 % to 100 %) examined with EEG had non-specific EEG-changes of a various genesis. A detection of the prevalence of non-specific EEG abnormalities in COVID-19 could have practical implication, particularly for prognosis of outcomes, only on condition of EEG analysis in samples of patients united by a certain common criterion, such as age, presence of certain neurological symptom/syndrome, specific neurological pathology in their anamnesis, etc.

Publisher

Public Organization Association of Neurologists, Psychiatrists and Narcologists of Ukraine

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3