Ki-67 Labeling Index in Pulmonary Carcinoid Tumors: Comparison Between Small Biopsy and Resection Using Tumor Tracing and Hot Spot Methods

Abstract

Context.— Pulmonary carcinoids are classified as typical or atypical by assessing necrosis and mitoses, which usually cannot be adequately assessed on small biopsies. Ki-67 is not currently used to grade pulmonary carcinoids, but it may be helpful to determine preliminary grade in biopsies. However, the rate at which Ki-67 could underestimate or overestimate grade on small biopsies has not been well studied. Objective.— To compare Ki-67 labeling obtained on small biopsies to subsequent resection. Design.— Ki-67 was performed on paired biopsy and resection specimens from 55 patients. Slides were scanned using Aperio ScanScope. Labeling index was determined using automated hot spot and tumor tracing methods. Results.— The study included 41 typical and 14 atypical carcinoids. Atypical carcinoids were larger and had more distant metastases. Death from disease occurred in 3 patients (all had atypical carcinoids). Median hot spot Ki-67 labeling index was greater in resection compared with biopsy by 0.7% (P = .02). Median tumor tracing Ki-67 was lower in resection compared with biopsy by 0.5% (P < .001). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed similar hot spot Ki-67 cutoffs to predict atypical histology (3.5% for biopsy, 3.6% for resection; area under the curve [AUC], 0.75 and 0.74, respectively). Different optimal cutoffs were needed for tracing method based on biopsy (2.1%; AUC, 0.75) compared with resection (1.0%; AUC, 0.67). Conclusions.— Hot spot Ki-67 tends to underestimate grade on small biopsies, whereas grade is overestimated by tumor tracing. Hot spot Ki-67 cutoff of 3.5% predicted atypical histology for both biopsy and resection. Different biopsy and resection cutoffs were necessary for tumor tracing, which would make clinical implementation more difficult.