The Effect of Changes in Laboratory Practices on the Rate of False-Positive Cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Author:

Breese Peter E.1,Burman William J.1,Hildred Mary1,Stone Barbara1,Wilson Michael L.1,Yang Zhenhua1,Cave M. Donald1

Affiliation:

1. Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colo; the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colo (Ms Stone); and the Regional Tuberculosis Genotyping Laboratory, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, Ark (Drs Yang and Cave).

Abstract

Abstract Context.—False-positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis have been found in nearly all DNA fingerprinting studies, but the effectiveness of interventions to reduce cross-contamination has not been evaluated. Objective.—To evaluate whether changes in laboratory policies and procedures reduced the rate of false-positive cultures. Design.—Retrospective study of isolates with matching DNA fingerprints. Setting.—A mycobacteriology laboratory serving an urban tuberculosis control program and public hospital system. Patients.—All M tuberculosis isolates processed from July 1994 to December 1999. Methods.—Isolates were fingerprinted using IS6110; pTBN12 was used to fingerprint isolates having fewer than 6 copies of IS6110. We further evaluated all patients having only one positive culture whose DNA fingerprint matched that of another isolate processed in the laboratory within 42 days. Interventions.—We changed laboratory policy to reduce the number of smear-positive specimens processed and changed laboratory procedures to minimize the risk of cross-contamination during batch processing. Main Outcome Measure.—The rate of false-positive cultures. Results.—Of 13 940 specimens processed during the study period, 630 (4.5%) from 184 patients and 48 laboratory proficiency specimens grew M tuberculosis. There were no cases (0/184) of probable or definite cross-contamination, compared with the 4% rate (8/199) identified in our previous study (P = .008). We also fingerprinted a convenience sample of isolates from other laboratories in Denver; 13.6% (3/22) of these were false-positive, a rate similar to the 11.9% rate (5/42) identified for other laboratories in our previous study (P = .84). Conclusions.—Laboratory cross-contamination decreased significantly after relatively simple, inexpensive changes in laboratory policies and practices. Cross-contamination continued to occur in other laboratories in Denver.

Publisher

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3