How the Pediatric Autopsy Yields Valuable Information in a Vertically Integrated Health Care System

Abstract

Abstract Context.—Although autopsy rates have declined significantly in recent decades, studies continue to validate the autopsy as an important source of clinically relevant information, a teaching tool, and a quality assurance measure. A recent review of autopsy series showed a decline in the number of serious errors likely to have affected clinical outcome detected at autopsy during the past 46 years, with a current major error rate of 8.4% to 24.4%. Objective.—Our hypothesis was that the pediatric autopsy would uncover a significant number of major unexpected findings at the high end of the spectrum predicted by a recent review. This study assesses the unexpected findings at a pediatric hospital whose autopsy service handles both in-house (tertiary care) and referral (mostly perinatal) cases for a vertically integrated health care system. Design.—Data were analyzed from an autopsy effectiveness report completed for all autopsies performed in 2000. The data from this series include concordance of premortem and postmortem diagnoses, with the autopsy considered the criterion standard. The autopsy effectiveness report also provided logistic information, such as problems with consents, medical records, specimen identification, and prosection. Setting.—Pediatric autopsies were performed by members of the Pediatric Pathology Division in a freestanding children's hospital in the Intermountain West of the United States with a large rural catchment area. This hospital is part of a large health maintenance organization serving the surrounding urban and rural areas. Patients.—A sample of all in-house and referral autopsies for the year 2000 was examined. Main Outcome Measure.—The percentage of cases with a major or minor diagnostic discrepancy or unexpected pathologic finding using the autopsy as the criterion standard. Results.—The overall autopsy rate was 40% (39 hospital autopsies and 15 forensic autopsies per 135 total deaths) and was 32% excluding forensic cases. Twenty-two additional referral autopsies from outside institutions were performed. Of 61 autopsies, 12 (20%) revealed a major diagnostic discrepancy or unexpected pathologic finding, 17 (28%) had a minor unexpected finding or additional diagnosis, 41 (67%) clarified the differential diagnosis, 46 (75%) confirmed or verified a major diagnosis, and 21 (34%) provided information regarding treatment effects. Additionally, 3 (5%) had problems with identification, and 12 (20%) had problems with consent, all of which were resolved prior to initiation of the autopsy. Conclusions.—These data confirm the value of the pediatric autopsy in a children's hospital and a vertically integrated health care system. It is an important medical and quality assurance procedure for assessing the accuracy of diagnoses, clarifying differential diagnoses, yielding unexpected findings, and providing feedback regarding therapeutic outcomes.