The Significance of Certification in Liquid-Based Cytology and Performance in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytopathology

Author:

Renshaw Andrew A.1,Mody Dina R.1,Walsh Molly1,Bentz Joel S.1,Colgan Terence J.1

Affiliation:

1. From the College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Resource Committee (Drs Renshaw, Mody, Bentz, and Colgan); Department of Pathology, Baptist Hospital of Miami, Miami, Fla (Dr Renshaw); Department of Pathology, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex (Dr Mody); Department of Biostatistics, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Ill (Dr Walsh); Department of Pathology, University of Utah

Abstract

Abstract Context.—Morphology training and certification provided by the manufacturer is required before laboratories are allowed to prepare and interpret liquid-based cytology (LBC) gynecologic slides. Whether this certification is associated with improved LBC interpretation performance is not known. Objective.—To determine whether LBC certification correlates with performance. Design.—The results of the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytopathology for the year 2004 were reviewed. During this year a question on the answer form asked participants whether they were certified in LBC preparations. Participant responses were analyzed at 2 levels of agreement with the reference diagnosis of unknown glass slides mailed quarterly. Results.—For cytotechnologists and pathologists, participants who were LBC certified had a significantly lower total discordant rate to series than participants who were not certified for validated LBC ThinPrep (Cytyc Corp, Marlborough, Mass) preparations (P < .001 for both groups). The results were similar for validated conventional preparations for pathologists but not for cytotechnologists. The differences were present across most individual diagnostic series. Differences were most striking for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. In addition, cytotechnologists and pathologists who were certified had a significantly lower total discordant rate to the exact diagnosis for validated LBC ThinPrep slides than those who were not certified (discordant rates for cytotechnologists, 14.14% and 23.36%, respectively, P < .001; for pathologists, 15.99% and 24.07%, respectively, P < .001). Conclusion.—Although not all confounding factors were excluded in this study, LBC certification is associated with a significantly lower discordant rate to both series and exact diagnosis for validated LBC ThinPrep preparations.

Publisher

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3