COMPLEX OF INDICATORS FOR ASSESSMENT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC RESULTS AND EFFICIENCY OF RESTORATION OF TERRITORIES DESTROYED DUE TO WAR

Author:

Martynovych N.О.ORCID,

Abstract

During the process of reforming the economic system of Ukraine and building an open society with a high level of social orientation, it is necessary to find a solution within in a short period of time, which will allow to fundamentally influence the stabilization of the post-war economy of the regions and, in the future, will stimulate the comprehensive development of the country, improving the socio-economic situation of its population. All these factors lead to the necessity of the development of an effective mechanism for evaluating the effectiveness of territorial development, the basis of which are the indicators. Therefore, the article is aimed at the development of theoretical, methodological and applied provisions regarding the assessment of socio-economic results and the effectiveness of the restoration of war-ravaged territories. The theoretical basis was the scientific works of domestic and foreign authors, some provisions of the Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Regarding the Basics of State Regional Policy and the Policy of Reconstruction of Regions and Territories”, Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine “On Approving the Tasks of the National Informatization Program for 2022-2024”, Essay of the Economic Policy Research Center “On the Reconstruction of Ukraine”, Project of the Department of Economics of NAS of Ukraine on the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine, the Project of the Recovery Plan of the National Council for the Recovery of Ukraine from the Consequences of the War, Report “On the Situation in Ukraine” of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. The generalization of various scientific points of view regarding the interpretation of the categories “complex” and “system” of indicators made it possible to conclude that these concepts have some differences. It was found that in modern science, the issue of distinguishing the complex and the system of indicators is debatable. In connection with this, the author's definition of a set of indicators for evaluating the economic and social results/efficiency of the restoration of war-ravaged territories has been proposed. It has been proven that the systematization of indicators should take place within the framework of a comprehensive territorial security-oriented approach. Its principles have been proposed. The conversion of territorial development has been conceptualized, the essence of which is to change the qualitative and quantitative socio-economic, ecological state of regions, which depend on the time and efforts of investors, the state, business, and ordinary citizens. It has been proposed to base the conversion of territorial development on the matrix method, in particular to use the BKG (Boston Consulting Group) matrix, which will make it possible to evaluate a large number of parameters (variables), to form an information base, because all information is processed and stored in a matrix form, to typologize territories and rank them in accordance with the Law of Ukraine “On making changes to some legislative acts of Ukraine regarding the principles of the state regional policy and the policy of restoration of regions and territories”. The author's approach contributes to the expansion of the theoretical-methodical and applied basis. In the future, the proposed complex will be used in the development of a methodology for assessing socio-economic results and the effectiveness of the restoration of war-ravaged territories.

Publisher

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)

Reference38 articles.

1. 1. Veblen T. The Theory of the Leisure Class. South Carolina: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2016. 194 р.

2. 2. Hodgson M. Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modem Institutional Economics by Geoffrey. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988, 365 p.

3. 3. O'Donnell G., Schmitter P. Transitions from Authorian Rule. Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins Unversity Press, 1986. 320 p.

4. 4. Keohane Robert О., Nye Joseph S. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston, 1977. 312 р.

5. 5. Stein А. Why Nations Cooperate. Circumstance and Choice in International Relations. Cornell University Press. Ithaca and London, 1990. 412 р.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3