Abstract
There is a struggle in Ukraine between the collectivism of the past and the individualized activity of the present with a propensity for opportunistic behavior. This profound contradiction is historically predetermined, and, in fact, it has set a higher level of social embodiment in formation of extractive institutions. Thus, both society and the state face the task of harmonizing the activities of public institutions, church organizations, parties and movements, as uncontrolled markets are devastating in their consequences because they lack moral foundations. In Ukraine, in the last three years, after a significant drop in the economy and implementation of austerity policy, 51,1% of the population has a level of income below the subsistence level. Possibilities of overcoming this destruction in the incomes of Ukraine’s population are significantly limited, since this negative tendency is logically linked to the relevant global processes, which in 20 years can deepen the inequality both in income and in terms of property control. As today’s experts on poverty issues say, it will be even more unfair to humans, and, accordingly, “the worlds of billions of poor” will be formed. And, as repeatedly stressed, this will be a characteristic feature of the “new Middle Ages”; since it is widely acknowledged that those who have property or capital grow up much faster than those who do not have such property. The current institutions of the state and government, including in Ukraine, are generally characterized by a low level of trust in society. Consequently, without close cooperation of the state with civil society organizations, successful reform of the domestic economy and conduct of active economic policy, if possible, it is only due to too slow progress, and even under the pressure of external factors not always realized in national interests. That is why the principles of “developing protectionism” in line with the national economic interests, which are under serious exogenous pressure, need to be updated in Ukraine. Therefore it is necessary to make a transition to a stable trajectory of long-term economic growth on the basis of endogenization, thanks to which the role of dominating now exogenous factors in economic development will decrease.
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka)
Reference23 articles.
1. 1. Korablin S.O. Makroekonomichna Dynamika Ukrainy: Pastka Syrovynnykh Rynkiv [Macroeconomic Dynamics of Ukraine: the Trap of Commodity Markets]. Kyiv, Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine, 2017 [in Ukrainian].
2. 2. Heyets V.M. Podolannya kvazirynkovosti - shlyakh do investytsiino orientovanoi modeli ekonomichnoho zrostannya [Overcoming the quasimarketness - a way to the investment-oriented model of economic growth]. Ekonomika Ukrainy - Economy of Ukraine, 2015, No. 6, pp. 4-17 [in Ukrainian].
3. 3. Sidenko V.R. Global'ni strukturni transformatsii ta trendy ekonomiky Ukrainy [Global structural transformations and trends in Ukrainian economy]. Ekonomika i prognozuvannya - Economy and Forecasting, 2018, No. 1, pp. 37-57, available at: http://eip.org.ua/docs/EP_18_1_37_uk.pdf [in Ukrainian].
4. https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.01.037
5. 4. Heyets V.M. Instytutsiina obumovlenist' endohenizatsii ekonomichnoho rozvytku [Institutional conditioning of the endogenization of economic development]. Zhurnal Evropeis'koi ekonomiky - Journal of European Economy, 2018, No. 2, pp. 16-28 [in Ukrainian].
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献