Abstract
The full-scale war started by Russia in Ukraine has caused many challenges to economic development, the overcoming of which is hard to be imagined without the research and innovation. Rebuilding R&I became another challenge for Ukrainian policymakers. Thus, the purpose of the paper is to analyze the R&I policy of Ukraine during the war caused by Russia and to develop policy recommendations for the postwar recovery. To achieve it, we used several methods, in particular expert opinion generalization, relevant scientific and policy literature analysis, and statistical analysis. The paper considers three approaches to innovation policy-making at crisis time: produce; procure; repurpose. Currently, Ukraine uses mainly the second one, by buying and receiving modern armament and equipment. Meanwhile, there were some innovative developments in Ukraine, which are not produced in sufficient quantities. After the war, Ukraine couldn’t buy armament due to fiscal constraints. Thus, in the short-run period, the government should reorient efforts toward repurposing of current developments. However, such an approach is not sustainable in the long-run period, when the development of a broader S&T base is required to create a solid base for further repurposing in emergency cases. The war caused massive damage to Ukrainian R&I potential, which by now is not fully measured and quantified. There are two types of damage: physical loss of research and innovation infrastructure (e.g. research facilities, and high-tech enterprises) and «brain drain», both of which should be the focus of R&I policymakers. Therefore, a set of policy measures is proposed to address the war-led challenges in R&I.
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
Reference36 articles.
1. 1. Gross, D., Sampat, B. (2020). Inventing the endless frontier: the effects of the World War II research effort on post-war innovation. HBS Working Paper, 20-126. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3623115
2. 2. Meske, Werner and Thinh, Dang Duy (Eds.). (2000.). Vietnam's research and development system in the 1990s: Structural and functional change. Research report. WZB Discussion Paper, P 00-401. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin. Retrieved from https://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2000/p00-401.pdf
3. 3. Local economic recovery in post-conflict: guidelines. International Labour Office, ILO Programme for Crisis Response and Reconstruction (ILO/CRISIS). Geneva: ILO. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/documents/instructionalmaterial/wcms_141270.pdf
4. 4. Leadbeater, C. (2020). Innovation and crisis: comparing wartime strategy to our COVID-19 response. NESTA blogs. Retrieved from https://www.nesta.org.uk/blog/innovation-and-crisis-comparing-wartime-strategy-our-covid-19-response/
5. 5. Heyets, V. et al (Eds.). (2015). Innovative Ukraine 2020: national report. NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].