Natural experiments as the latest tools in labor economics

Author:

Blyzniuk ViktoriiaORCID,

Abstract

The works by three scientists: D. Card, J. Angrist and G. Imbens received the highest award of economic scientific heritage in memory of A. Nobel last year. The scientific community recognizes their empirical contribution to the labor economy and their original view of causation and justification of methodological approaches to their evaluation in real life. It is well known that most of the problematic issues in the social sciences are related to causation. There is a need to assess the effects of uncontrolled migration on wages and employment in the regions where migrants arrive. And how to assess the impact of the duration of education on future earnings? The lack of a comparative framework, such as information on the consequences of changes in migration or refusal to continue training, makes it very difficult to assess the consequences and causation. But the winners of 2021 proved the possibility of answering such questions by conducting natural experiments that are similar to clinical trials in medicine. The results of their research have allowed economists around the world to obtain and use the toolkit of natural experiment in the study of economic processes. Without violating ethical norms, the winners were able to assess the effects of various factors and the socio-economic effectiveness of causal relationships. A special advantage of their scientific results is the change of the research paradigm and the updating of tools in labor economics. Renouncing the traditional view of experimentation, the Nobel laureates in economics argued that they could consider a significant number of economic agents in roughly the same situation and, observing changes in their behavior and consequences, conclude and evaluate causal relationships. The author of the article, analyzing the scientific achievements of last year's winners, concludes that the latest toolkit for randomized experiments have allowed the winners to get original and very controversial answers to traditional tasks, thus carrying out a "revolution of trust" in economics.

Publisher

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)

Reference22 articles.

1. Card, D. (October 1992a). Do Minimum Wages Reduce Employment? A Case Study of California, 1987-89. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 46 (1), 38-54. Retrieved from: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=00197939%28199210%2946%3A1%3C38%3ADMWREA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-%23

2. 2. Card, D. (October 1992b). Using Regional Variation in Wages to Measure the Effects of the Federal Minimum Wage. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 46(1), 22-37.

3. 3. Card, D., Krueger, A. B. (1994). Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. The American Economic Review, 84 (4), 772-793. American Economic Association. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2118030

4. 4. Card, D., Krueger, A. B. (May 1995). Time-Series Minimum-Wage Studies: A Meta-analysis. The American Economic Review, 85 (2), 238-243. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=00028282%28199505%2985%3A2%3C238%3ATMSAM%3E2.0.CO%3B2-M

5. 5. Card D., Krueger, A. B. (November 1994). The Effect of the Minimum Wage on Shareholder Wealth. Working Paper 337. Industrial Relations Section Princeton University. Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/minwage-shareholder.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3