Improvement in the information component to control natural monopoly

Author:

Bandura OleksandrORCID,

Abstract

We define the specific features in the control over natural monopoly and the main drawbacks in the contemporary methods of such a control. Also, we analyze some alternative methods of monopoly control that take place in world practice. This paper presents a possible way to improve the information component for quantitative control of natural monopoly using the method of marginal price level fixing (method of price coefficients changing). This method is a widespread one that is used for price regulation of natural monopoly in highly developed countries. However, the method to define the main elements in the corresponding formula — inflation number, economic efficiency factor (X-factor) and effect of external factors (Z-factor) — is still to be elaborated. This fact is one of the main objective reasons why this method is not presently used in practice in Ukraine. Of fundamental importance is the uncertainty of the efficiency factor (X-factor) revision criteria. It can contribute to the slowdown of investments, reducing the interest of the monopolist in large-scale and long-term investments. This paper presents an attempt to eliminate most of the above mentioned drawbacks in the method of the marginal price fixing (method of price coefficients changing) using author's CMI-model of macroeconomic dynamics. We propose a method to define unambiguously the efficiency factor (X) for natural monopoly. Also, we have modified the formula to define the price (tariff) for a product of natural monopoly in order to stimulate the monopoly's innovative and investment activity while keeping the consumer’s interest, and to eliminate the slowdown effect of investments. Besides, using the CMI-model we are able to determine quantitative indexes of monopoly power and the rate of effect of this power on the economy as a whole and on its various sectors. These indexes are proposed as additional ones to the price (tariff) formula to verify the results of the formula’s action.

Publisher

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)

Reference6 articles.

1. 1. Haimson, M. (2015). Domination: The Consequence of a Modern Day Monopoly. Business/Business Administration, 29. Retrieved from https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/honorscollege_business/29

2. 2. Lahutin, V.D., Borovyk, Yu.I. (2013). Priorities for price (tariff) regulation of natural monopoly in Ukraine. Ekon. Ukr. - Economy of Ukraine, 7 (620), 44-58 [in Ukrainian].

3. 3. Depoorter, B. (1999). Regulation of Natural Monopoly. Center for Advanced Studies in Law and Economics University of Ghent, 5400, 498-530.

4. The Profit Rate as a Measure of Monopoly Power;Bain;The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1941

5. 5. The Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine (2006). White book. Improvement for system of the natural monopoly tariff regulation. Retrieved from https://brdo.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Vdoskonalennya-systemy-taryfnogo-regulyuvannya-pryrodnyh-monopoliy-BKU.pdf

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3