LOCAL PLANNING INSTRUMENTS IN UKRAINE: EXPERIENCES AND CHANGES FROM A LONG-TERM PERSPECTIVE

Author:

Lytvynchuk M.Yu.ORCID, ,Denysenko O.O.ORCID,Melnychuk A.L.ORCID, ,

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the evolution of local planning instruments in Ukraine from Soviet times to the current state, rethinking the framework of local planning and the role of particular instruments. Planning instruments, notably local planning instruments, by their content and planning practices to a large extent reflect the social and political context of the territory and therefore they are going through significant changes in the course of transition and later transformations. The Ukrainian experience provides important insights for rethinking planning in post-transitional regions, as it illustrates how the role and functions of planning at the local level were changed, how certain instruments were transformed, and how new approaches and concepts were introduced. The paper builds upon extensive materials on the elaboration of regional planning schemes and projects, city planning and construction in the USSR, laws of Ukraine, and state construction regulations of Ukraine and reviews the main stages of local planning instruments development and transformation. The evolution of the instruments in the post-Soviet perspective in the paper is analyzed in terms of their influence on spatial development. It is argued that local planning instruments have evolved significantly, new tools have appeared, and they have become more publicly available and community-oriented, thus reflecting the ongoing rethinking of planning at the local level.

Publisher

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Management of Technology and Innovation,General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Earth-Surface Processes,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference31 articles.

1. 1. Nedović-Budić, Z. (2001). Adjustment of planning practice to the new Eastern and Central European context. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(1), 38-52. DOI: 10.1080/01944360108976354.

2. 2. Sýkora, L. (2006). Urban development, policy and planning in the Czech Republic and Prague. In: Spatial planning and urban development in the new EU member states: from adjustment to reinvention, 113-140.

3. 3. Hirt, S., & Stanilov, K. (2009). Revisiting urban planning in the transitional countries. Regional study prepared for Planning sustainable cities: Global Report on Human Settlements 2009. URL: https://staging.unhabitat.org/downloads/docs/ GRHS2009RegionalTransitionalCountries.pdf

4. 4. Hirt, S. (2015). Planning during Post-socialism. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition, Vol. 18. Elsevier.

5. 5. Golubchikov, O. (2004). Urban planning in Russia: towards the market. European Planning Studies, 12(2), 229-247. DOI: 10.1080/0965431042000183950.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3