Abstract
The article highlights the process of constructing the image of the enemy in Ukrainians after the beginning of the full-scale invasion by Russia on February 24, 2022. Even though the war has been going on for 2014 years, the full-scale invasion changed the image of the enemy: now it becomes specific from the general image of Russia, and the Russian people are added to the list of enemy subjects, in addition to the government and the army. Based on in-depth interviews conducted immediately after the beginning of the invasion, the main characteristics of the enemy image construction among Ukrainian citizens are analyzed. What kind of enemy can be reflected through the description of personal characteristics of the enemy and emotions that arise towards him. The central element in the perception of the enemy image is that the government, the military, and the population appear as not very powerful but, at the same time, dangerous enemies. Emotionally, two emotions are predominant in Ukrainians’ perception of the enemy: hatred and disgust, which translates into a vision of future relations with Russia. The psychological processes of stereotyping the enemy, mirroring, dehumanization, and selective perception are present in forming the enemy image in the respondents. In addition, a psychological balance shows that the worse the enemy, the better “we” are, and the enemy itself is dangerous but one that can be overcome and defeated.
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
Reference25 articles.
1. 1. Kermach, R. (2017). Review of The Attitude of Ukrainians to Russia and Russians: Dynamics and Major Trends. In O. Haran (Ed.), Social Transformations Attitudes in the Conditions of the Opposition Russian Aggression in Donbas: Regional Dimension (pp. 199-220). Kyiv: Stylos. URL: https://spa.ukma.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/donbas.pdf [in Ukrainian]
2. The Attitude of Ukraine's Population to Russia and Russia's Population to Ukraine (2008-2020);Paniotto;NaUKMA Research Papers,2020
3. The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization;Kteily;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 109 (5),2015
4. Enablers of hybrid warfare: The Bulgarian case;Hadzhiev;Journal of International Studies 13 (1),2020
5. 5. Hoffman, F.G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Arlington, Virginia: Potomac Institute For Policy Studies.