Affiliation:
1. Institute of Sociology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Abstract
The article examines the dynamics of social status self-evaluations of the Ukrainians based on two waves (2009 and 2019) of the Social Inequality module of International Social Survey Programme. Three types of social status self-evaluation in different biographical situations were noted: the current one (at the time of the survey), the retrospective one (of the parents’ family status) and the perspective one (status of oneself in 10 years’ time). They were measured through the respondents’ self-determination of their appropriate status on an imaginary 10-step social ladder. The noticeable changes for the better in the current social status self-evaluations of the Ukrainians are stated, which is visualized in changing the diagram of their distribution from pyramidal shape (where the lower-middle and the lowest positions are the basic ones) to the close to rhombus shape (where the majority is concentrated on the middle levels). The retrospective self-evaluations still demonstrate negative situation: the respondents mostly perceive the social status of parents’ families as higher than their current status. At the same time, the perspective self-evaluations of the Ukrainians are rather optimistic: majority of them hope to significantly increase their own status in the social hierarchy in the next decade.
A connection between the class positions (both objectively and subjectively determined) and the status self-evaluations of three kinds was also studied. It is recorded that in both years of the survey this connection remains quite significant and expected in nature. Regarding EGP-classes: representatives of service classes and small owners had significantly higher current, retrospective and prospective self-evaluations than working-class people, primarily unskilled workers and farm labours. Regarding the subjective classes defined by nominal categories (upper middle, middle, lower middle, working, lower class): the higher the subjective class position a person has, the higher he/she evaluates his/her social status.
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka)
Reference38 articles.
1. Berger, R., Grusky, D., Raffel, T., Samuels, G., Wimer, C. (2010). The inequality puzzle: European and US leaders discuss rising income inequality. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
2. Bottero, W. (2019). A sense of inequality. London: Rowman Littlefield International.
3. Evans, G. (1993). Class conflict and inequality. International Social Attitudes: the 10th BSA report (рр. 123–142).
4. Ganzeboom, H. B. G., De Graaf, P., Treiman, D. J., De Leeuw, J. (1992). A Standard International Socio-Economic Index of Occupational Status. Social Science Research, 21, 1–56.
5. Gimpelson, V., Treisman, D. (2018). Misperceiving inequality. Economics Politics, 30(1), 27–54.