Abstract
Abstract
This study presents one undergraduate program's analysis of a writing-centered learning outcome, operationalized in terms of American Psychological Association (APA) style, using a standardized rubric. The analysis of data from year one revealed several problematic areas. The rubric was revised and the same outcome was analyzed again the following year. Data from year two demonstrated improvement, but also revealed a different set of concerns. Ultimately, the process proved useful for assessing student writing and making revisions as a result.
Publisher
The Pennsylvania State University Press
Reference26 articles.
1. American Psychological Association. 2009. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. 6th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Barrett, Jason M. 2012. “Writing Assessment in the Humanities: Culture and Methodology.” Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness 2 (2): 171–95.
3. Bazerman, Charles. 1987. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
4. Bazerman, Charles, Joseph Little, Lisa Bethel, Teri Chavkin, Danielle Fouquette, and Janet Garufis. 2005. Reference Guide to Writing Across the Curriculum. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press LLC.
5. Blattner, Nancy H., and Christina L. Frazier. 2002. “Developing a Performance-Based Assessment of Students' Critical Thinking Skills.” Assessing Writing 8 (1): 47–64.