Public Service Media as a Political Issue: How Does the European Parliament Approach PSM and Communication Rights?

Author:

Rodríguez-Castro Marta1,Campos-Freire Francisco1,López-Cepeda Ana2

Affiliation:

1. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

2. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha

Abstract

Abstract Platform dominance, threats to media freedom and disinformation are some of the key phenomena that are shaping the current media environment in Europe and threatening citizens' communication rights. Within this context, Public Service Media (PSM) could have an important role to play, although explicit political support is needed. This article studies the main communication and PSM topics that have been discussed in the European Parliament during the past term (2014–2019) as well as the proposals drafted by political parties for the 2019 European election. The results show that the main proposals linked to PSM involve their independence and the need for increased collaboration, including the establishment of a European public service platform that would enhance the development of a European public sphere.

Publisher

The Pennsylvania State University Press

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Communication,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Communication

Reference67 articles.

1. Aslama Horowitz, Minna, and Hannu Nieminen. “European Public Service Media and Communication Rights.” In Crossing Borders and Boundaries in Public Service Media, edited by Gregory Ferrell Lowe and Nobuto Yamamoto, 95–106. Göteborg: Nordicom, 2016.

2. Bowen, Glenn A. “Document Analysis As a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9, no. 2 (2009): 27–40. doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027.

3. Brevini, Benedetta. “Towards PSB 2.0? Applying the PSB Ethos to Online Media in Europe: A Comparative Study of PSBs' Internet Policies in Spain, Italy and Britain.” European Journal of Communication 25, no. 4 (2010): 348–65. doi:10.1177%2F0267323110381004.

4. Broughton Micova, Sally, Felix Hempel, and Sabine Jacques. “Protecting Europe's Content Production from US Giants.” Journal of Media Law 10, no. 2 (2019): 219–43. doi:10.1080/17577632.2019.1579296.

5. Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom. Monitoring Media Pluralism in Europe: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor 2017 in the European Union, FYROM, Serbia & Turkey. 2018 Policy Report. Firenze, Italy: European University Institute, 2018. Accessed February 6, 2020. https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/60773/CMPF_PolicyReport2017.pdf?sequence=4.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3