Affiliation:
1. University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Most scholarship on Milton’s Paradise Lost takes Eve and Adam’s sex and gender difference for granted. While critics highlight the queer potentialities of Miltonic matter, they often focus on the epic’s angels and overlook Eve and Adam’s corporeal, yet still vital, materiality. This article turns its attention to the queer and trans possibilities in the first created humans. Bringing together accounts of queer Miltonian metaphysics, feminist psychoanalysis, and trans quantum materialism, I argue that while prelapsarian Eve and Adam have a real subjective difference, this difference is not an a priori sexed or gendered one, nor is it ontological. I offer a transpsychoanalytic reading of Eve and Adam’s unfallen subjectivities, which are structured without an originary loss, and explicate their difference while illustrating how unfallen Eden is a place without cis, binary sex and gender as we know it.
Publisher
The Pennsylvania State University Press
Subject
General Medicine,Literature and Literary Theory
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. John Milton's Eve in Paradise Lost;The Routledge Companion to Eve;2023-08-07