Affiliation:
1. Stanford University, lanier@stanford.edu
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Pippin treats Nietzsche's moral psychology as the key to his philosophy. Three aspects of the psychology are meant to bear this weight: (1) a critical and deflationary, but irreducibly hermeneutic, conception of the nature of moral psychology itself; (2) a thesis that eros is central to Nietzsche's theory of valuing; and (3) an expressivist theory of action, which replaces the causal role of intention with an interpretive notion of expression in explaining action. Pippin's handling of all three, but especially the third, places Nietzsche's philosophy in a Hegelian light, as does his view that genuine action arises from a deep-going self-dissatisfaction. I raise doubts about whether the expressivist theory of action can be adequate to all actions and suggest that the centrality of self-dissatisfaction for Pippin stands in tension with Nietzsche's own construal of the demand for affirmation of life.
Publisher
The Pennsylvania State University Press
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Nietzschean Autonomy and the Meaning of the “Sovereign Individual”*;Philosophy and Phenomenological Research;2021-08-21
2. Overcoming Affective Nihilism;The Problem of Affective Nihilism in Nietzsche;2020
3. Cognitive Nihilism, Affective Nihilism, and Their Interplay;The Problem of Affective Nihilism in Nietzsche;2020
4. Affective Nihilists, Weak Agents;The Problem of Affective Nihilism in Nietzsche;2020
5. Fugitive Pleasure and the Meaningful Life: Nietzsche on Nihilism and Higher Values;Journal of the American Philosophical Association;2015