Where There’s a Will, There’s a “Why?” Part 2: Implications of Value Determinism for the Objectivist Concepts of “Value,” “Sacrifice,” “Virtue,” “Obligation,” and “Responsibility”
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The author continues his challenge to the “official” Objectivist view of free will by addressing the implications of his value-determinism/conditional-volition model for various Objectivist moral concepts including value, sacrifice, virtue, obligation, and moral and legal responsibility and accountability. He argues that based on Rand’s definitions, the conventional understandings of sacrifice or betrayal of values, lapses in virtue, and breaches in morality need considerable reconceptualizing. The author gives special attention to Rand and Kant with regard to lying, use of force, and acts of generosity, finding not nearly as much difference between them as is commonly believed.
Publisher
The Pennsylvania State University Press
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Philosophy
Reference109 articles.
1. Is Virtue Only a Means to Happiness? An Analysis of Virtue and Happiness in Ayn Rand’s Writings. With commentaries by Jay Friedenberg, Lester Hunt, and David Kelley;Objectivist Studies,2001
2. Moral paragons and the Metaphysics of Morals,2006
3. Political expediency and lying: Kant vs Benjamin Constant;Journal of the History of Ideas,1982
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献