Author:
Earle David M.,Clarkson Smith Georgia
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The Smart Set is known as a popular venue for modernist writers and cultural criticism, but upon Mencken and Nathan's departure it became Hearst's sensational confessional title. This article examines the confessional form for elements of populist empowerment, and in so doing questions periodical studies' methodology of selective reading. In addition, this article argues that the Smart Set was always commercial, playing both sides of the cultural divide despite tendencies for modernist canonization on the part of critics. Ultimately, it is up to the literary historian to convey a realistic portrait of a magazine and up to the reader to decide how to interpret its cultural stance.
Publisher
The Pennsylvania State University Press
Subject
Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Communication
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献