Affiliation:
1. University of British Columbia
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Marx studied how capitalism changes relations to land before and after Capital—but wielded different methodologies and reached different conclusions. In Grundrisse, Marx investigates precapitalism from a speculative standpoint. In Capital, Marx provides a selective and historical description of dispossession but delimits his analysis to Western Europe. Post-Capital, Marx wields Henry Lewis Morgan’s anthropology and Justus von Liebig’s ecology as scientific bases upon which to critique capitalist property relations. Specifically, Marx believed that the capitalist mode of production installed a historically specific relation to land; and that this relation was abstract, accumulative, and proprietorial. This article shows that Marx began to develop a critical theory of dispossession that overspills the historical, metaphysical, and developmental sequencing usually attributed to him. This late Marx believes that Indigenous peoples have a concrete, metabolic, and communal relationship to the land that communism must recapitulate and rehabilitate; this thesis has been misunderstood by readers of Marx, who impose an overly historicized interpretation upon his work.
Publisher
The Pennsylvania State University Press
Reference21 articles.
1. “Marx’s Theory of Metabolic Rift: Classical Foundations for Environmental Sociology.”;American Journal of Sociology,1999
2. Foster, John Bellamy, BrettClark, and HannahHolleman. 2020. “Marx and the Indigenous.”Monthly Review (February): https://monthlyreview.org/2020/02/01/marx-and-the-indigenous/.