The Relevance of Global Reform of Bank Regulation: A Perspective from Africa

Author:

Kasekende Louis A.1

Affiliation:

1. Louis A. Kasekende Deputy Governor, Bank of Uganda lkasekende@bou.or.ug

Abstract

The global financial crisis exposed fundamental weaknesses in the financial regulation, prompting ongoing efforts to strengthen the regulatory framework. The key features of the global reforms are: higher mandatory minimum capital adequacy ratios, together with improvements in the quality of capital; introduction of minimum liquidity requirements; introduction of macro-prudential tools; proposals for the resolution of globally systemically important banks. The international character of banking provides a clear rationale for global minimum regulatory standards, especially to avoid regulatory arbitrage, whereby banks locate in the jurisdictions with the least onerous regulations, spurring a race to the regulatory bottom. Hence key regulatory innovations have been drawn up at the global level and most governments around the world, including those in Africa, have incorporated them into their own national banking regulations. The aim of this paper is to assess the implications of the global regulatory reforms for bank regulation in Africa and, in particular, whether the specific reforms are likely to be helpful or counterproductive for banking system stability in Africa. The paper aims to help fill a gap in the literature on the latest global reforms to bank regulation; relatively little of which has assessed these issues from the standpoint of developing countries.

Publisher

The Pennsylvania State University Press

Reference23 articles.

1. Agenor, Pierre-Richard and Pereira da Silva, Luiz A. (2010), “Reforming International Standards for Bank Capital Requirements: A Perspective from the Developing World”, International Finance Review, Vol 11, pp191–254.

2. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2010A), “Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems”, Bank for International Settlements.

3. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2010B), “Calibrating regulatory minimum capital requirements and capital buffers: a top down approach”, Bank for International Settlements.

4. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2011), “Global systemically important banks: assessment methodology and the additional loss absorbency requirement”, Bank for International Settlements.

5. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2014), “Impact and implementation challenges of the Basel framework for emerging market, developing and small economies” Working Paper No 27 prepared by the Basel Consultative Group, Bank for International Settlements.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3