Author:
Al-Gobari Muaamar,Shoman Yara,Blanc Solenne,Guseva Canu Irina
Abstract
AIMS OF THE STUDY: To estimate the prevalence of occupational burnout among the Swiss working population.
METHODS: We interrogated three international databases (Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, and PsycINFO) and the databases of 15 Swiss universities to identify studies reporting the prevalence of occupational burnout in Swiss workers over the last 10 years, before the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were summarised descriptively and quantitatively using random-effects meta-analysis. We investigated between-study heterogeneity by stratifying results according to the type of burnout measurement tool, by occupation and by cut-off values. Three outcomes were considered: clinical/severe burnout, overall burnout and emotional exhaustion.
RESULTS: We identified 23 studies about workers in Switzerland and estimated the prevalence of clinical or severe burnout at 4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2–6%). The average prevalence estimates for overall burnout and emotional exhaustion were similar at 18% (95% CI 12–25%) and 18% (95% CI 15–22%), respectively. When stratified by occupation, the clinical or severe burnout rates were higher among the healthcare workers than the general working population.
CONCLUSIONS: These estimates of prepandemic (baseline) prevalence of occupational burnout are comparable with those available in the other countries where it is recognised and treated as a disease. They may prove useful in planning and assessing the effectiveness of interventions for prevention of occupational burnout and in minimising its negative consequences on individuals and on societies during and after the pandemic.
Publisher
SMW Supporting Association
Reference65 articles.
1. Heinemann LV, Heinemann T. Burnout Research:Emergence and Scientific Investigation of a Contested Diagnosis. SAGE Open. 2017;7(1):2158244017697154. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017697154
2. Bouter LM, Zielhuis GA, Zeegers MP. Textbook of epidemiology: Bohn, Stafleu van Loghum.; 2018.
3. Guseva Canu I, Marca SC, Dell'Oro F, Balázs Á, Bergamaschi E, Besse C, et al. Harmonized definition of occupational burnout: A systematic review, semantic analysis, and Delphi consensus in 29 countries. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health. 2021;47(2):95-107. Epub 2020/12/02. doi: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3935. PubMed PMID: 33258478; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC8114565.
4. WHO. World Health Organization. International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics (11th Revision). Retrieved from https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en. 2018.
5. Guseva Canu I, Mesot O, Györkös C, Mediouni Z, Mehlum IS, Bugge MD. Burnout syndrome in Europe: towards a harmonized approach in occupational health practice and research. Industrial health. 2019;57(6):745-52. Epub 2019/03/01. doi: https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2018-0159. PubMed PMID: 30814391; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6885602.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献