Post-bariatric contour deformity correction: an endeavour to establish objective criteria nationally

Author:

Brühlmann Jérémy,Lese Ioana,Grobbelaar Adriaan O.,Fischlin  Claudia,Constantinescu Mihai,Olariu Radu

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A marked increase in bariatric surgery has led to higher numbers of patients with contour deformities after massive weight loss seeking plastic surgical correction. Insurance coverage for these post-bariatric interventions is highly subjective and a common set of objective criteria has not yet been established. AIM: The aim was to evaluate the factors influencing insurance coverage for post-bariatric surgery, focusing on finding objective, reproducible criteria. METHODS: This was a retrospective single centre chart review of all post-bariatric patients with redundant skin requesting body contouring surgery from 2013 to 2018. Demographic, bariatric and surgical, as well as insurance information were collected. A logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of successful insurance coverage. RESULTS: 116 Patients were included in the study. Insurance approval for post-bariatric body contouring surgery was obtained for only 47 patients (41%). Mentioning the term “medical indication” in the application letter was associated with a 15.2 times higher rate of receiving a positive answer (p <0.001), whereas mentioning “mental suffering” was associated with 82.3% lower chance of getting a positive response (p <0.001). A high body mass index (BMI) (p <0.009) before the bariatric operation as well as a high BMI reduction (p <0.021) were associated with a higher approval rate by insurance companies . An additional application letter to the insurance company (p <0.024) as well as mentioning mechanical restriction (p <0.022) were associated with a positive response from the insurance companies. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to establish certain objective predictive criteria for insurance coverage of post-bariatric surgery. However, it appears that the decisions of insurance companies for this condition are still rather randomly taken. Therefore, the establishment of objective criteria for insurance coverage may allow fairer treatment for this growing patient population.

Publisher

SMW Supporting Association

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3