LSP curriculum development: from theory to practice. A case study

Author:

M. Maci Stefania

Abstract

A Language for Specific Purposes (LSP) course is one in which the methodology, content, objectives, materials, teaching and assessment practices all derive from the specific use of a target language based on a specified set of professional needs. Developing an LSP curriculum involves a very similar process to any other language course, because it should be systematic and defensible, and should start by understanding the needs of the students taking the course. Furthermore, the current trend seems to be moving towards a process of internationalization in most regions, whereby ‘internationalization’ is often understood by stakeholders as ‘English’. By providing practical examples, and based on a self-ethnomethodological approach, this paper tries to describe the process we used to create an LSP syllabus as a curriculum for an MA in tourism planning and management, where English is the language of instruction. While the theoretical approach to curriculum development is linear, the reality is much more complex: though curriculum development and syllabus creation are intrinsically linked to needs analysis to such an extent that without a needs analysis they cannot be planned, there are cases where a needs analysis cannot be done because similar curricula or syllabi do not exist. Then, the LSP teacher must resort to what has been defined as a needs analysis on the run while adopting an interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approach to curriculum development. In this process, students play an active role and promote their interest with the teacher who could thus adjust and implement the envisaged educational goals. The hope is to provide teachers and curriculum developers with the information and tools they may need to design and create their own LSP courses.

Publisher

University of Ljubljana

Reference55 articles.

1. Abbott, G. (1980). ESP and TENOR. ELT Documents, 107, 122–124.

2. Airey, J. (2016). “I don’t teach language.” The linguistic attitudes of physics lecturers in Sweden. AILA Review, 25(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.25.05air

3. Baker, R. L. (1969). Curriculum evaluation. Review of Educational Research, 39(3), 339–358. https://doi. org/10.3102/00346543039003339

4. Bhatia., V. K. (2004). Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. Continuum International.

5. Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Longman.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3