Plotinus and Wang Yangming on the Structures of Consciousness and Reality

Author:

Bartosch David

Abstract

In this paper, particular key aspects of the philosophies of Plotinus and Wang Yangming have been analysed comparatively on the basis of important passages of their works. The method used for this investigation can be defined as that of transversal comparative induction, in which the focus is more on working out the details of affinities and similarities. As this means a first step in an encompassing systematic context, differences will be introduced more briefly. The present investigation aims to provide a foundation for a more differentiating and therefore complementing second part, which will consider other contents and topics in both philosophies. The present analysis is performed in three systematic steps and with regard to three basic philosophical ideas: (1) the idea that human consciousness is a central medium in the universal process and interrelatedness of (biological) life as a whole; (2) the idea that the self-unfoldment of reality represents a meta-cognitive process beyond the limits of subjectivity and finite consciousness; and (3) the idea that it is our major task to perfect and know ourselves by means of a “return” to the highest underlying foundation of this universal process. In their own ways, Plotinus and Wang Yangming both show that by enfolding human reflexivity toward the ineffable source of all reality in thought, feeling, human activity, and natural processes, namely by actively pursuing the path of moral and intellective perfection, we become fulfilled mediators of a universal process and of that which all of it represents.

Publisher

University of Ljubljana

Subject

Literature and Literary Theory,Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy,History,Cultural Studies

Reference50 articles.

1. Aubry, Gwenaëlle. 2020. “An Alternative to Cartesianism? Plotinus’s Self and its Posterity in Ralph Cudworth.” In Self-Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy: The Eighth Keeling Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, edited by Fiona Leigh, 210–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2. Bartosch, David. 2010. “Zur Rede vom immanenten gute (Ge-)Wissen (liang zhī 良知) bei Wáng Yángmíng (王陽明 1472–1529) aus interkulturell philosophierender Perspektive.” In Oldenburger Jahrbuch für Philosophie 2010, edited by Christine Zunke, 7–37. BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg: Oldenburg.

3. ———. 2015a. “Tierethik in der chinesischen Tradition.” Coincidentia: Zeitschrift für europäische Geistesgeschichte 6 (2): 449–68.

4. ———. 2015b. „Wissendes Nichtwissen“ oder „gutes Wissen“? Zum philosophischen Denken von Nicolaus Cusanus und Wáng Yángmíng. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink.

5. ——— (Dawei Batuoshi 大卫·巴拓识). 2018a. “Kusa de Nigula de Zhexue Zhong de Jingzi Yinyu库萨的尼古拉哲学中的镜子 (The Mirror Metaphor in the Philosophy of Nicolas of Cusa).” Jidujiao Wenhua Xuekan 基督教文化学刊 40: 92–107.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3