Abstract
The early Confucian texts Mengzi 孟子 and Xunzi 荀子 introduce strict distinctions between the human and non-human realms and formulate genealogies and theories of “human supremacy”. Starting from the claim that humans are superior to animals and other non-human beings, they draw the sociopolitical conclusion that the former ought to enact supremacy by dominating and domesticating the latter. Taking up non-humanist ideas formulated in the Laozi 老子, the Zhuangzi 莊子forcefully challenges those genealogies and theories. Numerous stories in the Zhuangzi express a Daoist anti-humanism seeking to subvert “humanist supremacy”, and, especially, its sociopolitical and moral practice. It is concluded that this specific Daoist anti-humanism is embedded in a wider project of promoting a state of human ease, and that its function is therapeutic rather than ideological.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy,History,Cultural Studies
Reference18 articles.
1. Alberts, Eli. 2007. A History of Daoism and the Yao People of South China. New York: Cambria.
2. Ames, Roger T. 2021. Human Becoming: Theorizing Persons for Confucian Role Ethics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
3. Chinese Text Project. n. d. Accessed January 31, 2023. https://ctext.org/.
4. Gentz, Joachim. 2013. “Religious Diversity in Three Teachings Discourses.” In Religious Diversity in Chinese Thought, edited by Perry Schmidt-Leukel, and Joachim Gentz, 122‒39. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Gier, Nicholas F. 2000. Spiritual Titanism: Indian, Chinese, and Western Perspectives. Albany: State University of New York Press.