Abstract
The paper contributes to the research on academic attribution by exploring syntactic-semantic patterns of English reporting verbs used by three types of academic writers, namely L2 novice (with Czech as their L1), L1 novice and L1 expert academic writers. It investigates the impact which both the EFL and EAP challenge has on the use of these verbs by L2 novice academic writers. Our approach combines contrastive analysis and learner corpus research, focusing on academic writing in English in the discipline of economics. The results suggest that although similarities among the groups prevail, Czech novice academic writers tend to resort to patterns associated with informal, conversational rather than academic style. Pedagogical implications of the findings could include raising students’ awareness of the practice of appropriate academic reporting as one of the skills needed for them to accommodate themselves to the conventions of English as the academic lingua franca.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Education
Reference35 articles.
1. Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Viviana Cortes. 2004. “If you look at…: Lexical Bundles in University Lectures and Textbooks.” Applied Linguistics 25 (3): 371–405. https://doi.org/10.109c3/applin/25.3.371.
2. Bloch, Joel. 2010. “A Concordance-Based Study of the Use of Reporting Verbs as Rhetorical Devices in Academic Papers.” Journal of Writing Research 2 (2): 219–44. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2010.02.02.7.
3. Brezina, Vaclav, and Dana Gablasova. 2015. “Is There a Core General Vocabulary? Introducing the New General Service List.” Applied Linguistics 36 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt018.
4. Chamonikolasová, Jana. 2005. “Comparing the Structures of Academic Texts Written in English and Czech.” In Slovak Studies in English 1, edited by Maria Huttová, 77–84. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského.
5. Charles, Maggie. 2006a. “The Construction of Stance in Reporting Clauses: A Cross-Disciplinary Study of Theses.” Applied Linguistics 27 (3): 492–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml021.