A Holistic Account of Adequacy Conditions for How to Look at Contraries

Author:

Mou Bo

Abstract

The aim of this essay is to give a meta-philosophical and meta-methodological characterization of some central characteristic features comparative philosophy as a general way of doing philosophy through cross-tradition engagement toward world philosophy. This is elucidated by presenting a holistic account of the conditions for maintaining adequate methodological guiding principles for appropriately and effectively considering different approaches to philosophy. This essay is meta-methodological in character: given that comparative philosophy sets out to explore how to adequately look at contraries (especially those from different philosophical traditions, but not limited to them, methodologically speaking), and given the self-reflective philosophical nature of comparative philosophy, exploring adequacy conditions for how to look at contraries is meta-methodological in character but also a significant part of comparative philosophy per se. This meta-methodological exploration in comparative philosophy is neither exhaustive nor exclusive: it is not exhaustive because comparative philosophy as a whole has other substantial contents; it is not exclusive because this suggested account itself is open-ended and can include further adequate conditions that would be complementary to the current set from the holistic vantage point, which is exactly one ending point of this essay.

Publisher

University of Ljubljana

Subject

Literature and Literary Theory,Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy,History,Cultural Studies

Reference13 articles.

1. Allinson, Robert E. 1998. “Complementarity as a Model for East-West Integrative Philosophy.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 25 (4): 505–17.

2. Allinson, Robert E. 2003. “Hegelian, Yi-Jing, and Buddhist Transformational Models for Comparative Philosophy.” In Comparative Approaches to Chinese Philosophy, edited by Bo Mou, 60–85. Aldershot: Ashgate.

3. Confucius (Kong Zi 孔子). The Lun-Yü《論語》(The Analects).

4. Hall, David L., and Roger T. Ames. 1995. Anticipating China, Thinking Through the Narratives of Chinese and Western Culture. Albany: SUNY Press.

5. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. (1807) [1967]. The Phenomenology of Mind (Phänomenologie des Geistes). Translated by J. B. Baillie. London: Harper & Row.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Re-inventing Chinese Philosophy through the Method of Sublation;Asian Studies;2024-05-06

2. Cross-Tradition Philosophical Engagement and Cross-Culture Dialogue: From a Holistic Vantage Point with Enhanced Explanatory Resources;Culture and Dialogue;2023-06-21

3. Introduction;Asian Studies;2023-01-10

4. Comparative Philosophy as a General Way of Doing Philosophy Through Cross-Tradition Engagement Toward World Philosophy;Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy;2022-07-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3