Abstract
This article draws attention to the comparison of pedagogy and andragogy. It is based on well-known writers within the field of adult education and learning. The selected literature is considered to give a representative picture of how comparing pedagogy and andragogy is generally approached, serving as my basis for critical consideration. In general, the comparisons are based on the traditional understanding of pedagogy and the understanding of andragogy in line with Knowles’s theory. This does not give a true picture of the circumstances. Pedagogy is much more than traditional pedagogy, and andragogy is much more than Knowles’s andragogy. The conclusion is that a reliable comparison demands a clarification of the terms included. Attention is also drawn to three perspectives on the pedagogy–andragogy relationship, namely, dichotomous, continuum, and relational perspectives. Here, too, a traditional understanding of pedagogy is the basis.
Reference37 articles.
1. Bright, B. P. (2018). Epistemological vandalism: Psychology in the study of adult education. In B. P. Bright (Ed.), Theory and practice in the study of adult education: The epistemological debate. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429436758
2. Conaway, W. (2009). Andragogy: Does one size fit all? A study to determine the applicability of andragogical principles to adult learners of all ages [Doctoral dissertation]. Walden University.
3. Cross, K. P. (1981). Adults as learners. Jossey-Bass.
4. Davenport, J. (1987). Is there any way out of the andragogy morass? Lifelong Learning, 11(3), 17–20.
5. Delahaye, B. (1987). The orthogonal relationship between pedagogy and andragogy: Some initial findings. Australian Journal of Adult Education, 27(3), 4–8.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献