Abstract
This article unpacks a particular use of ‘cases’ within developmental biology, namely as a means of describing the typical or canonical patterns of phenomena. The article explores how certain cases have come to be established within the field and argues that although they were initially selected for reasons of convenience or ease of experimental manipulation, these cases come to serve as key reference points within the field because of the epistemological structures imposed on them by the scientists using them and, hence, become usable in a wider variety of circumstances including future theory development.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,History
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Normal development and experimental embryology: Edmund Beecher Wilson and Amphioxus;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences;2016-06
2. Contrasting Cases: The Lotka-Volterra Model Times Three;Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science;2016
3. Case Studies: One Observation or Many? Justification or Discovery?;Philosophy of Science;2012-12