Abstract
This article considers the following question: What is the relationship between supervenience and reduction? I investigate this formally: first, by introducing a recent argument by Christian List to the effect that one can have supervenience without reduction; then, by considering how the notion of Nagelian reduction can be related to the formal apparatus of definability and translation theory; then, by showing how, in the context of propositional theories, topological constraints on supervenience serve to enforce reducibility; and, finally, by showing how constraints derived from the theory of ultraproducts can enforce reducibility in the context of first-order theories.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,History
Reference17 articles.
1. Less is Different: Emergence and Reduction Reconciled
2. MORITA EQUIVALENCE
3. Patten, D. R. 2014. “Problems in the Theory of Convergence Spaces.” PhD diss., Syracuse University.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Classical Stance: Dennett’s Criterion in Wallacian quantum mechanics;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science;2024-10
2. Theoretical Relicts: Progress, Reduction, and Autonomy;The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science;2023-03-17
3. Functionalism as a Species of Reduction;Synthese Library;2023
4. Structure and Equivalence;2022-02-16
5. Bibliography;The Logic in Philosophy of Science;2019-07-31