Abstract
Much of the literature on values in science is limited in its perspective because it focuses on the role of values in individual scientists’ decision making, thereby ignoring the context of scientific collaboration. I examine the epistemic structure of scientific collaboration and argue that it gives rise to two arguments showing that moral and social values can legitimately play a role in scientists’ decision to accept something as scientific knowledge. In the case of scientific collaboration some moral and social values are properly understood to be extrinsic epistemic values, that is, values that promote the attainment of scientific knowledge.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,History
Reference87 articles.
1. One-Shot Science
2. Group Agency
3. Group Justification in Science
4. GroupthinkversusThe Wisdom of Crowds: The Social Epistemology of Deliberation and Dissent
5. Wagenknecht, Susann . 2013. “Collaboration in Scientific Practice: A Social Epistemology of Research Groups.” PhD diss., Aarhus University.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献