Author:
Bramson Aaron,Grim Patrick,Singer Daniel J.,Berger William J.,Sack Graham,Fisher Steven,Flocken Carissa,Holman Bennett
Abstract
Polarization is a topic of intense interest among social scientists, but there is significant disagreement regarding the character of the phenomenon and little understanding of underlying mechanics. A first problem, we argue, is that polarization appears in the literature as not one concept but many. In the first part of the article, we distinguish nine phenomena that may be considered polarization, with suggestions of appropriate measures for each. In the second part of the article, we apply this analysis to evaluate the types of polarization generated by the three major families of computational models proposing specific mechanisms of opinion polarization.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,History
Reference66 articles.
1. Deffuant, Guillaume . 2006. “Comparing Extremism Propagation Patterns in Continuous Opinion Models.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9, no. 3.
2. Candidate Entry and Political Polarization: An Antimedian Voter Theorem;Großer;American Journal of Political Science,2013
3. Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?
4. Klemm, Konstantin , Eguiluz, Victor M. , Toral, Raul , and Miguel, Maxi San . 2003a. “Global Culture: A Noise-Induced Transition in Finite Systems.” Physical Review E, 67.
Cited by
93 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献