Abstract
Many of the arguments against reductionism and fundamental theory as a method for explaining physical phenomena focus on the role of models as the appropriate vehicle for this task. While models can certainly provide us with a good deal of explanatory detail, problems arise when attempting to derive exact results from approximations. In addition, models typically fail to explain much of the stability and universality associated with critical point phenomena and phase transitions, phenomena sometimes referred to as “emergent.” The paper examines the connection between theoretical principles like spontaneous symmetry breaking and emergent phenomena and argues that new ways of thinking about emergence and fundamentalism are required in order to account for the behavior of many phenomena in condensed matter and other areas of physics.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,History
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The principle of least action and teleological explanation in physics;Synthese;2023-07-12
2. Near-Death Experiences and Emergent Dualism;Theology and Science;2023-04-03
3. Book Forum;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science;2023-02
4. Reckoning with Continuum Idealizations: Some Lessons from Soil Hydrology;Philosophy of Science;2022-02-11
5. Hierarchical Emergent Ontology (HEO);Hierarchical Emergent Ontology and the Universal Principle of Emergence;2022