Abstract
I consider and reject William Whewell's attack on the inductivism of Isaac Newton and John Stuart Mill, as well as John Norton's attack on any universal system of inductive rules. I also explain how a system of inductive rules of the sort proposed by Newton and Mill should be understood.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,History
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A Framework for Inductive Reasoning in Model-Based Science;Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso;2023-12-26
2. Question-driven stepwise experimental discoveries in biochemistry: two case studies;History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences;2022-03-23
3. Introduction;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A;2021-02
4. Epistemic benefits of the material theory of induction;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A;2020-12
5. Debunking material induction;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A;2020-12