Author:
Yang Yun-Liang,Ho Yong-An,Cheng Hsiao-Hsu,Ho Monto,Lo Hsiu-Jung
Abstract
AbstractObjective:To determine the susceptibilities ofCandidaspecies isolated from Taiwan to amphotericin B and fluconazole.Design:Prospective surveillance study.Methods:Each hospital was asked to submit up to 10C. albicansand 40non-albicans Candidaspecies during the collection period, from April 15 to June 15, 1999. One isolate was accepted from each episode of infection. The broth microdilution method was used to determine susceptibilities to amphotericin B and fluconazole.Results:Only 3 of 632 isolates, one each ofC. famata, C. krusei,andC. tropicalis,were resistant to amphotericin B. A total of 53 (8.4%) of 632 clinical yeast isolates, consisting of 4%C. albicans,8%C. glabrata,15%C. tropicalis,and 70%C. krusei,were resistant to fluconazole. In contrast, noC. parapsilosisisolate was resistant to fluconazole. Isolates from tertiary-care medical centers had higher rates of resistance to fluconazole than did those from regional and local hospitals (11.4% vs 6.6%). Isolates from different sources showed different levels of susceptibility to fluconazole. All of the isolates with the exception ofC. tropicalisandC. kruseiisolated from blood were susceptible to fluconazole. A pattern of co-resistance to both amphotericin B and fluconazole was observed.Conclusions:Non-albicans Candidaspecies had higher rates of resistance to fluconazole than didC. albicans(44 of 395 [11.2%] vs 9 of 237 [3.8%];P= .002). The increasing rate of fluconazole resistance inC. tropicalis(15%) is important becauseC. tropicalisis one of the most commonly isolatednon-albicans Candidaspecies.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),Epidemiology
Cited by
92 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献