Species Pluralism Does Not Imply Species Eliminativism

Author:

Brigandt Ingo

Abstract

Marc Ereshefsky argues that pluralism about species suggests that the species concept is not theoretically useful. It is to be abandoned in favor of several concrete species concepts that denote real categories. While accepting species pluralism, the present paper rejects eliminativism about the species category. Based on the idea that the species concept is a so-called investigative kind concept, it is argued that the species concept is important and that it is possible to make sense of a general species concept despite the existence of different concrete species concepts.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,History

Reference23 articles.

1. The meaning of ‘meaning’

2. Brigandt, Ingo (n.d.b), “The Role a Concept Plays in Science—The Case of Homology”, manuscript.

3. Eliminative Pluralism;Ereshefsky;Eliminative Pluralism,1992

Cited by 49 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Disagreement & classification in comparative cognitive science;Noûs;2023-10-16

2. Norms of evidence in the classification of living fossils;Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution;2023-06-27

3. The neutral theory of conceptual complexity;Philosophy of Science;2023-02-16

4. Living fossils and conservation values;Frontiers in Earth Science;2023-01-20

5. The development of artificial intelligence in education: A review in context;Journal of Computer Assisted Learning;2022-06-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3