Large AI Spaces and Russia’s Strategy in the Context of the “Sanctions War”
-
Published:2022-07-03
Issue:2
Volume:22
Page:256-270
-
ISSN:2313-0679
-
Container-title:Vestnik RUDN. International Relations
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Vestn. Ross. univ. družby nar., Ser. Meždunar. otnoš.
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the role of technological development in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) in the international political processes, the formation of large policy spaces in the field of AI, as well as the development of Russia in this area. The author provides an analysis of national AI strategies, examines the priority spheres and directions of development of these technologies for different countries, the availability of resources for the goals set, and the specifics of national AI policies of the leading states. The article compares the data on the volume of funding for AI developments, patent activities, and the existing infrastructure for high-performance computing in the countries, that occupy leading positions in the field of AI. The paper provides a brief overview of the key scientific and technological areas that are crucial for the creation of next-generation AI technologies: quantum computing and neuromorphic technologies within the framework of existing major national projects on the study of the brain. The author devotes a special place to the study of international political aspects of technological development in the field of AI in the work. From the perspective of the impact of AI policy on integration processes, the conclusion is made about the formation of two spaces: the first unites the OECD countries with the unconditional leadership of the USA and the EU in the field of research, development, infrastructure, resources, and international standards. The second, restrained space, relies on the technological and financial power of China, where are starting to get involved countries, including Russia, that are facing with narrowing range of opportunities for cooperation with Western countries. The author concludes that the confrontation between the two AI spaces is influenced by a more general trend of decoupling of the economies of the USA and China, which in turn contributes to technological isolation trends at the global level. A special place in the article is devoted to the analysis of the development of AI technologies in Russia; it considers official documents, leading players, and Russia’s positions at the international level. The possible directions of Russia’s cooperation with the world leading players are considered, which allows to develop AI technologies and at the same time maintain technological sovereignty in this area.
Publisher
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,History,Development
Reference22 articles.
1. Anokhin, K. V. (2010). The last great frontier of the life sciences. Economic Strategies, 12(11), 56-63. (In Russian). 2. Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., et al. (2019). Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature, 574, 505-510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 3. Balakin, D. A., & Alikberova, A. R. (2019). Digital Silk Road in the context of the People’s Republic of China. Opción, 35(22), 308-318. 4. Danilin, I. V. (2020). The U.S. - China technology war: Risks and opportunities for P.R.C. and global tech sector. Comparative Politics Russia, 11(4), 160-176. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10056 5. Giglavy, A. V., Sokolov, A. V., Abdrakhmanova G. I., Chulok, A. A., & Burov, V. V. (2013). Long-term trends in the ICT sector. Foresight-Russia, 7(3), 6-24. (In Russian).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Palladium Effect: Great Power Values in the Era of Artificial Intelligence;Journal of Political Research;2023-12-25 2. The EAEU’s AI Strategy;EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics;2022-10-14
|
|