Taking back control: The role of image schemas in the Brexit discourse

Author:

Martín de la Rosa VictoriaORCID

Abstract

Can image schemas sustain the discourse on Brexit while building up emotional and evaluative dimensions in the process? This paper analyzes the embodied meaning used in the Brexit discourse as seen through the lens of the pro-leave newspaper (The Telegraph). By way of a discourse-based approach, the main goal of this study is to show the persuasive role that two recurrent image schemas (CONTAINMENT AND FORCE) play in the characterization of the Brexit discourse, which were used to evoke strong feelings of fear and anger to mobilize readers into taking a defensive position against the EU at the time of the referendum. Regarding the material to be analyzed, a corpus of 43,576 words was compiled, distributed in 34 opinion articles and 13 leading articles, from May 22 to June 22, 2016. The data were analyzed from the perspective of Conceptual Metaphor Theory, where the embodiment of the mind plays a key role. The analysis reveals that the use of the metaphor scenario ‘take back control’, bringing together the use of image schemas and conceptual metaphor, galvanizes the readership’s support against the EU through the use of this realistic formula in a less cognitively demanding manner. The study of image schemas seems to provide an important avenue for understanding the representation of complex political issues such as that of Brexit, underpinned by the use of highly compressed and simple information with a deliberate emotional load.

Publisher

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference71 articles.

1. Andrews, Kehindre. 2021. The New Age of Empire: How Racism and Colonialism still Rule the World. New York: Bold Type Books.

2. Breeze, Ruth. 2020. Introduction: Approaching metaphor in political discourse. In Ruth Breeze & Carmen Llamas Saíz (eds.), Metaphor in political conflict. Populism and discourse. Navarra: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra (EUNSA). ISBN 978-84-313-3467-3

3. Breeze, Ruth. 2023. Time for Brexit? Temporalities in the 2019 UK European election campaign. Text & Talk. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2022-0004

4. Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2006. Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse and Society 17 (5). 563-581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506066345

5. Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3