Classical theories of media systems: relevance for the contemporary research

Author:

Yakova Tamara S.ORCID,Volkova Irina I.ORCID

Abstract

The results of a comparative analysis of classifications of media systems developed by foreign researchers in the 20th-21st centuries are presented. Particular attention is paid to the criteria, determinants and comparison parameters that were used in different classifications to identify common characteristics of media systems in different countries. The empirical base of the study includes both popular and little-known authors in the Russian scientific literature, but widely cited in foreign studies, who have formed original classification structures. The basis for the choice of concepts and classifications were the results of the analysis of research and educational programs of Russian and foreign universities, the historical sequence of scientific papers, logical connection with predecessors and followers, contribution to the scientific literature on the theory of journalism and high citation in modern media studies. The main criterion for the selection of the most popular classifications became a citation analysis of foreign researchers’ scientific publications on this topic in the scientometric system Google Scholar that accumulates scientific works from different countries, as well as statistics of Yandex. It is concluded that the main characteristics of media systems, as well as the criteria and parameters used in the most famous classifications (the second half of the 20th - beginning of the 21st century), remain relevant and can be adapted to the analysis of the modern media sphere.

Publisher

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference27 articles.

1. Bakulev, G.P. (2005). Normative theories of mass communication. Sociological Studies, (1), 105-114. (In Russ.)

2. Blum, R. (2014). Lautsprecher und Widersprecher: Ein Ansatz zum Vergleich der Mediensysteme. Köln: Herbert von Halem.

3. Blumler, J.G. & Gurevitch, M. (1981). Politicians and the press. In D. Nimmo & K. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 467-493). Beverly Hills California: Sage Publications.

4. Blumler, J.G. & Gurevitch, M. (1995). The crisis of public communication. 1st ed. London, New York: Routledge.

5. Бакулев Г.П. Нормативные теории массовой коммуникации // Социологические исследования. 2005. № 1. С. 105-114.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3