The Ban on Idolatry and the Concept of Difference in Franz Rosenzweig’s Philosophy

Author:

Pigalev Alexander I.ORCID

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to analyze the context, the essence, and the philosophical implications of Franz Rosenzweig's reconsideration of the ban on idolatry as an implication of pure monotheism. As often as not idolatry is defined generally as the adoration of some images that, representing deity, are considered to be autonomous and hereupon become the objects of worship. The study confines itself to the analysis of the significance of the ban on idolatry in Rosenzweig's interpretation of the concept of difference that underlies his theoretical model of the Other. The consideration proceeds on the general assumption that the encounter of tradition with modernity is the factor that determines the radical change in the philosophies of societies under modernization. In this context, the ancient ban on idolatry means the rejection and prohibition of whatever representation as intricate mediation that is, in turn, the hallmark of modernity. However, according to Rosenzweig, idolatry is not the usage of images as the representations of the reputedly unrepresentable God, but the fixation on one image which would mean the arbitrary limitation of God's infinite freedom to reveal himself visually. This implies that the reconsidered ban on idolatry does not require the absolute prohibition of representation, but the latter should be construed as temporal. Such an approach prevents the identification of the representation of entity with this entity itself, the sign with the thing, and therefore prohibits self-referentiality. Rosenzweig's stance determines also his understanding of familiarity, unfamiliarity, and difference in art and translation. Rosenzweig's emphasis on the shocking influence of the defamiliarizing difference as the feature of the work of art correlates with his interpretation of the translation that should make stable shared senses unfamiliar. Thus, the reconsidered ban on idolatry underlies Rosenzweig's conception of the reconciliation between Jewish tradition and modernity.

Publisher

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Subject

Philosophy

Reference15 articles.

1. Rosenzweig F. Das neue Denken. Einige nachträgliche Bemerkungen zum “Stern der Erlösung”. In: Der Mensch und sein Werk. Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. 3. Zweistromland: Kleinere Schriften zu Glauben und Denken. Hrsg. von R. Mayer und A. Mayer. Dordrecht, et al.: Martinus Nijhoff; 1984. s. 139-161.

2. Halbertal M., Margalit A. Idolatry. Goldblum N (tr.). Cambridge (MA), London: Harvard University Press; 1992.

3. Strauss LB, Brenner M, editors. Mediating Modernity: Challenges and Trends in the Jewish Encounter with the Modern World: Essays in Honor of Michael A. Meyer. Detroit (MI): Wayne Stae University Press; 2008.

4. Meyer MA, Myers DN, editors. Between Jewish Tradition and Modernity: Rethinking an Old Opposition: Essays in Honor of David Ellenson. Detroit (MI): Wayne State University Press; 2014.

5. Löwy M, Sayre R. Romanticism Against the Tide of Modernity. Porter C (tr.). Durham; London: Duke University Press; 2001.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3